2014 was its 50th anniversary:
We all know it well. The Woolmark logo – applied to more than five billion items worldwide – is frequently credited with being a concise and powerful symbol to the point that, in 2011, the British monthly magazine Creative Review even voted it the best logo ever, while in 2013 a survey conducted by USA graphic design journal GDUSA voted the logo as the 11th favourite logo from the past half-century.
But its story is so terribly tangled that it somehow lies between legend and something like a spy story…
“Early in the 1960’s the world’s wool growers faced up to the brutal reality that synthetic fibers were becoming a very serious threat” [from “Famous American trademarks”, 1971]. “In short, in the words of the managing director of the International Wool Secretariat [a non-profit organization established in 1937 that gathered wool producers from over 30 countries, Ed.], Mr Bill Vines, the prices the world has been prepared to pay for wool have been substantially determined by the price levels of the various synthetic alternatives. […] It would be disastrous for wool to attempt to follow the synthetics down in an attempt to retain a part of the mass fibre market. […] wool prices have to be stabilised. […] How can this be done? Mr Vines and his IWS board representing the woolgrowers of Australia, New Zealand and South Africa have come up with their answer. They are setting out to establish for wool products a quality – as opposed to a luxury – image in the minds of the consumer. […] To help in achieving this objective, the IWS proposes to establish under its legal ownership a series of national wool trademarks, linked by an internationally common basic design. It will promote these trademarks until they become household names to millions of people in each major wool-using country. […] The trademark project will be part of a five-year IWS plan to expand world wool promotion” [from “Critical Era for Wool” in “The Bulletin”, 11 May 1963].
Thus, at the end of 1962, the IWS announced the project to create a global graphic identity for wool that would “hold consumer confidence and represent quality standards”, dispelling “the confusion caused by various fibers claimed to be ‘like wool’ or ‘good as wool'” [from “Ada Evening News”, 10/01/1965]. “Its purpose is to give a clear identity to products made of pure new wool, to invest them accordingly with the stamp of quality and so, in the long-term, free wool from a restrictive price relationship with synthetics” [from “The Second Annual Report of the Australian Wool Board for year 1963-64“].
Franco Grignani had been invited to join the jury of 6 internationally-known experts (Sir Gordon Russell – one of Britain’s foremost design experts and director of the Council of Industrial Design – as Chairman of the selection panel) for the final choice of the logo. Shortly before his departure to London at the end of 1963 (Franco did not speak English, so he asked his daughter Daniela to go with him), a Mr. Spiriti introduced himself as an appointee for the advertising agency who worked for the Italian Pure Wool Secretariat (most probably – but tbc – Studio 37 Pubblicità: in 1963, the year in which the “Palma d’Oro della Pubblicità” – the “Golden Palm-tree for advertising” – was not awarded, a gold medal was anyway conferred to the IWS for the color pages in the periodical press produced by Studio 37 Pubblicità in Milan – from “Corriere della Sera”, 7 Oct. 1963). Mr. Spiriti was in charge of collecting the graphic material to be exhibited at the selection panel and expressed his intention to submit to Grignani the projects collected up to then. But, discouraged by the inadequacy of the proposals, Grignani decided to withdraw from the jury and sent his resignation to London; Mr. Spiriti, worried by such reaction, insisted that he review his decision by suggesting, at least, something of his own, as time was running out. London was pressing for Grignani not to refuse to be part of the jury and Spiriti did the same for presenting something of an adequate level. Therefore, Grignani began to study something that would represent the high-quality level of Italian design. It is said that one day at lunch on the white tablecloth, with the tines of his fork he drew a rotation with arches: that is the idea of the famous “wool ball”. At the time, my grandmother Jeanne loved knitting and had at home always some balls of the famous “Lana Gatto“; she had collaborated as well on the previous IWS Italian propaganda called “Vesti Bene, Vesti LANA” (“Dress Well, Dress in WOOL”). The logo was originally created by assembling three copies of a single nine-striped band in black and white, as demonstrated by a photographic negative rediscovered in Grignani’s archive and also suggested by the recent “green Woolmark” (introduced to reinforce the ‘eco’ credentials of wool within The Campaign for Wool, which started in Oct. 2010). Franco Grignani made some variations by experimenting with the different thicknesses of the lines. It was a stylized sign, an experiment in black and white graphics in the typical style of his visual language (see this ad), “with swirling lines which have a constant movement symbolizing both the timelessness of wool and its modernity in the space age” [from “Ada Evening News”, 10/01/1965].
Plans for a “quality image in wool trademark” dated back from 1962: speaking in Melbourne, the managing director Mr. Vines declared that “the I.W.S. plans to finalize the design of the symbol by the end of 1962” [from “The Times”, 2 Nov. 1962], but patenting a mark in 90 countries was legally more complicated than expected and “the symbol is the result of two years intensive research and design work throughout the world by IWS staff and advisors. Thousands of man-hours have been spent sifting through countless trade and company marks. Findings of the special research team caused many potential symbols to be discarded because they might have been confused with existing trademarks or did not meet the high standard set by the IWS” [from “Western Herald”, 21/02/1964].
It is worth noting that – up to now – I haven’t found any official “call for entries” for a public competition for the “wool symbol” in the period 1962-1963; however, (only) 13 designers were involved in the final selection.
Perhaps he was naively sure not to win in such an international competition or most likely there had been a misunderstanding with Mr. Spiriti, but Grignani’s disbelief was evident when the participants in the jury – immediately and unanimously – showed their favour to his logo among the eighty-six competitors, with the only exclusion of Grignani himself who, aware of being in such an embarrassing situation, voted against his own work till the end. He came back to the hotel feeling broken, and at the final dinner of the two days in London in 1963, everybody kept asking him why he had voted against something beautiful that could even have been done by him. “The International Woll Secretariat has spent two years developing a symbol for wool […] When the search for a woolmark began, the secretariat thought it would not take long – until they discovered that many ideas are already protected by existing symbols. As a result, it commissioned 13 designers to put up suggestions, and these were vetted by a legal team before being presented to a panel of international design experts to judge. The experts, under the chairmanship of Sir Gordon Russel, took 10 hours to make their decision, despite the fact that there was a surprising amount of agreement between them as to which symbols might be acceptable and which could be discounted right from the start. The final choice does away with lettering – partly because the initials of the IWS vary from country to country – and relies upon a purely pictorial idea” [from “Design”, n° 185, May 1964].
Mr. Spiriti died suddenly short after, and he could not help clarify the facts. So, for a long time, the logo had been credited to a certain Francesco Saroglia (see, for example, “Trademarks & Symbols” volume 2, 1973, pages 123 & 173), since Grignani didn’t reveal his authorship except within his collaborators.
It has been assumed that the Italian Secretariat decided that they would find an employee from their graphics department who had to be considered as the official author of the logo. So the assumption is that Saroglia was, in fact, a real person connected to the IWS, and not just an alias chosen by Grignani. The hypothesis from a few years ago that Francesco Saroglia was only a fake name is objectively wrong, but in the digital age of “copy-&-paste”, it has unfortunately somehow prevailed on the web. Historical sources I recently found undoubtedly support the opposite: an ad for the Italian branch of the IWS that appeared in the British magazine “Modern Publicity” n° 39, 1970 is referred to “Saroglia Francesco – Saroglia Studio Pubblicità – viale Piceno 19, Milan” [°: see Ed. note]: Saroglia used the “wooly fish” photographed by Edoardo Mari (who collaborated as a photographer in various ads for IWS Italy) that won the “Palma d’Oro” in 1962, but the ad displays the Woolmark and various adaptations are to be dated after 1964, including a commercial. We can therefore assume that Saroglia kept going in advertising “his” logo, although we cannot quantify his commitment, given that the IWS ads in Italy hardly ever carried the name of the art director. Thus, the lack of other significant works signed Saroglia, and the fact that he did not even appear on the occasion of the presentation of the logo to the press at the IWS headquarters in Milan in front of 500 persons (February 19, 1965), contributed to create the mystery around this person, recently leading to the hasty and erroneous equation: “no works = no person”. In 1964, the IWS released a photo where Francesco Saroglia seemed inspired by a black and white Möbius-like strip. With evident reference to this image, a completely different version of the birth of the logo idea was spread in 1965 in these terms [from the Dutch magazine Ariadne]: “‘Coincidence’, intuition, helped Saroglia in the design, thanks to his special knowledge of macro-photography. Saroglia’s starting point was: the mark should reproduce the structure of a woolen thread and he started to strip paper marked with black and white lines. Twisting, bending, and shaping the forms thus obtained, he made strong photographic enlargements that he accidentally [sic] saw reflected in a mirror – and the international woolmark was born!”. Already in 1964, the same magazine pointed out: “Saroglia has a hobby, which he pursues alongside his work as art director of Studio 37 Pubblicità [°: see Ed. note] in Milan. That is macro-photography. He incorporates objects or parts thereof in close-up, enlarges them and thus obtains new shapes and compositions”. The “Canberra Times” wrote in 1972 more details on Francesco Saroglia: “Mr. Saroglia, who is married and has three children, has been an artist all his working life. He was born at Turin, Italy, and trained for three years at the Albertina Academy of Fine Arts, Turin. At the end of World War II he moved to Milan and went into advertising. Since then he has been art director of a number of Italian advertising agencies”; and, finally, in 1987, the same periodical changed once more the aforementioned version, stating that “Saroglia said he was inspired to produce his design from the winter frost patterns on a window of his home”…
Announced in Britain on January 17, 1964 [from “Birmingham Daily Post”, 18/01/1964], and launched on September 18, 1964 – only for worsteds and knitwear and, from 1965, spread to other woolens [from “Birmingham Daily Post”, 17/09/1964] – the elegant logo (called “Woolmark” from 1964) “has helped reinvent the global perception of wool as a natural, contemporary and glamorous fiber”, commented Woolmark Company, and by 1997 more than $1 billion was said to have been spent in promoting it (recognized in 1987 by more than 400 million people all over the world), but Grignani never got, or even asked, a penny for it.
“Miss World 1964“, 20 years old Ann Sidney from Dorset, also signed up as the wool ambassador throughout her ‘reign’, with the aim of helping to launch the Woolmark internationally with a planned journey of 50,000 miles [from “Coventry Evening Telegraph”, 26/11/1964]. “The signing was made because the Secretariat wanted a public relations vehicle to get through to the teenage and early twenties market” [from “Wool Industry Act – Annual Report of the Australian Wool Board, for Year 1964-65“].
In Italy, after an initial propaganda on magazines, Reginald G. Lund – Regional Director of IWS branches in Europe – together with Ulderigo Salvi – IWS Officer in Charge for Italy – and the President of the IWS Advisory Committee, presented the Woolmark on February 19, 1965, in front of 500 retailers from all over Italy, gathered in the Milan headquarters of the IWS (“Palazzo di Fuoco”) for the “Six days of wool” with the aim of studying the means of defending the quality of wool, through meetings throughout Italy [from “Corriere della Sera”, 20 & 21 Feb. 1965]. The journey ended in Rome with a special audience of Pope Paolo VI, who was given a gold medal bearing the logo. For the XMas period of 1965, a long red carpet was laid down the length of the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele in Milan, bearing the Woolmark [from “The Times”, 30 Dec. 1965]. The first Italian company that obtained the right to use the Woolmark certification was the “Lanificio Ermenegildo Zegna” (licence n° 1 of May 20, 1964), for which Grignani developed a series of innovative ads in the years 1964-1968; he was as well Artistic Director of the magazine “Top” (born in 1966).
The question of the authorship of the Woolmark was raised quite soon, but Grignani began to declare that he was the designer of the logo years later (interview with Donato Matarelli, magazine “Parete”, n° 15, Apr. 1970). Creating just some more confusion, some reporters started to attribute it, by similarity, also to Bridget Riley [“The Times”, 21 July 1971], and it was only in 1995, aged 87, that Grignani displayed, at an exhibition at Milan’s Aiap Gallery, the nine proposals for his logo reproduced in his old Olivetti organizer of 1960, where Franco and his assistant classified some works carried out (by crossing them out):
Still in 2014, Australian Wool Innovation Chief Strategy and Marketing Officer Rob Langtry declared that “The logo’s strength is in its simplicity: five black bands criss-crossing to form a skein of wool which perfectly represents the softness, elegance and modernity of the fibre. It is one of very few long-running logos that still feels contemporary despite not having been altered since its creation.”
[°] further researches in historical archives in Milan led me recently to discover these official data: “Studio 37 Pubblicità” di Brancaleon Luigi (who in 1964-66 participated in numerous delegations abroad – USA & Japan – with the management of the famous national newspaper “Corriere della Sera”) opened on March 15, 1961, and was located in Piazza Risorgimento, 10 in Milan, then moved on August 1, 1962, to Viale Piceno, 19 (less than 1 km from the previous headquarters), closed on March 31, 1969, and contextually changed its name to “Saroglia Studio Pubblicità S.A.S.” di Saroglia Francesco (born 21/01/1922, lived some 500m from the Studio), but early closed again on March 15, 1971
[a] “Design”, n° 185, May 1964
[b] “Domus”, n° 430, Sept. 1965
[c] “The Times”, supplement on Australia, March 1966
[d] “Panorama”, n° 31, April 1965
[*] courtesy of Daniela Grignani
 CREATIVE REVIEW
 Veder bene, courtesy of Bonifacio Pontonio
 Unit Editions Studio, courtesy of Bethan Roberts
‘Celebrating 50 years’ pic from wool.com
[special acknowledgment to Paul Wilson from the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences in Sydney for his precious support]
Last Updated on 18/06/2021 by Emiliano